A family lost their electrician husband and father when he came into contact with an unmarked live wire that was allegedly not de-energized during a home renovation. The contracting company initially denied liability. Our construction accident lawyers reviewed and relied on Section 225 of the Alberta Electrical Code (C22.1-18) and provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act (SA 2017, c O-2.1), which addressed compliance with lockout and energy-control procedures. The matter was resolved through a wrongful death settlement, providing compensation for loss of income, dependent support, and bereavement-related damages, with coordination involving the Workers’ Compensation Board where applicable.

A laborer was injured when a bulldozer and concrete barrier collided during an industrial site incident, resulting in pelvic fractures, internal injuries, and PTSD. The employer raised an assumption-of-risk defense. Our construction accident lawyers relied on Section 2(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Code, which addresses employer obligations related to safety procedures for heavy equipment operation. Through the claims process, the worker was able to pursue compensation covering multiple surgeries, psychological treatment, vocational retraining, and pain and suffering, while navigating applicable workers’ compensation and regulatory requirements.

An experienced carpenter suffered multiple spinal fractures when a scaffold collapsed at a commercial construction site. The site contractor’s insurer initially disputed liability, alleging improper assembly by the worker. Our construction accident lawyers reviewed obligations under Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety legislation and examined whether appropriate inspection and safety procedures were followed. Through the claims process, the worker pursued compensation related to spinal surgery, permanent functional limitations, and future income loss under applicable legislation, helping support financial stability when returning to the trade was no longer possible.

A 9-year-old suffered traumatic injuries when attacked by a neighbor’s dog with known aggressive tendencies. The insurance company raised arguments regarding contributory negligence related to alleged teasing. Our dog bite accident lawyers reviewed Alberta’s Occupiers’ Liability Act (RSA 2000, c O-4), including the duty of care owed to child visitors, along with the dog’s prior history as documented under local animal control bylaws. Compensation was pursued to address reconstructive surgeries, anticipated future procedures, and psychological impacts requiring ongoing therapeutic support.

A package delivery worker was mauled by a homeowner’s dog while attempting a delivery, resulting in significant leg injuries requiring multiple surgeries. The homeowner claimed adequate warning signs were posted. Our dog bite accident lawyers relied on applicable provisions of the Municipal Government Act (RSA 2000, c M-26) and relevant local bylaws concerning animal restraint. Through the claims process, the injured worker pursued compensation to address wage loss during an extended recovery period, ongoing physical therapy, and permanent mobility limitations.

A jogger suffered severe facial lacerations and nerve damage from an unleashed dog attack. The owner’s insurance offered a limited settlement, claiming the jogger provoked the animal. Our team assisted the client in pursuing a claim under Section 2(1) of Alberta’s Dangerous Dogs Act, which addresses liability for injuries caused by dogs. Through the claims process, the client pursued compensation under the owner’s home insurance policy for reconstructive surgeries, psychological counseling for PTS

A worker was injured by defective machinery. The insurer claimed misuse. Our lawyers assisted the worker in pursuing a claim under the Occupiers’ Liability Act. The matter was resolved with compensation intended to address rehabilitation and lost income.

A professional suffered life-threatening effects from a drug with poor warnings. The company offered little. Our product liability lawyers relied on relevant Alberta evidentiary principles to assist the client in pursuing a claim, resulting in a resolution that addressed future care needs and damages.

A Calgary resident experienced serious complications following a hip implant. The manufacturer raised issues related to the surgical procedure. Our lawyers reviewed the matter under applicable Alberta consumer protection legislation and assisted the client in pursuing compensation for medical costs, lost wages, and other damages.

‍

A business executive tumbled down a poorly lit staircase when a loose handrail gave way, resulting in multiple fractures and career-impacting cognitive issues from head trauma. The restaurant claimed they had no prior knowledge of the defect. Our slip and fall lawyers utilized Section 5(1)(a)(ii) of the Occupiers’ Liability Act regarding the duty to inspect premises, and presented evidence of previous complaints through discovery. We were able to assist the client in pursuing compensation for various losses, including future income impacts, under the framework established in Andrews v. Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd. [1978] 2 SCR 229.

A tenant sustained a severe concussion and back injuries after falling on an inadequately maintained icy walkway outside his apartment building. The property management company denied responsibility, claiming the weather was unforeseeable. Our slip and fall lawyers cited Section 6(1) of the Occupiers’ Liability Act regarding the higher duty of care for residential premises, along with Municipal Snow and Ice Removal Bylaw 4M81. We helped the tenant pursue compensation within the two-year limitation period established by the Limitations Act (RSA 2000, c L-12), which included amounts for income loss, medical expenses, and quality-of-life impacts.

A 62-year-old grandmother slipped on a recently mopped floor with no warning signs, suffering a broken hip requiring surgery and extended rehabilitation. The store initially made a modest offer, claiming she wasn’t watching where she was walking. Our slip and fall lawyers established liability under Section 5 of Alberta’s Occupiers’ Liability Act (RSA 2000, c O-4), demonstrating the store’s failure to take reasonable care to ensure visitor safety. We helped her pursue appropriate compensation covering surgical needs, rehabilitation support, home care considerations, and pain and suffering, properly accounting for her pre-existing osteoporosis under the thin skull rule established in Athey v. Leonati [1996] 3 SCR 458.

A senior was administered ten times the prescribed dose of blood thinners, resulting in internal hemorrhaging and permanent kidney damage. The hospital attributed it to patient miscommunication. Our medical malpractice lawyers in Calgary reviewed the matter in accordance with applicable healthcare legislation regarding proper medication administration protocols. We assisted the client in pursuing a compensation claim through the legal process covering extended rehabilitation, specialized care requirements, and other losses permitted under Alberta law.

A 42-year-old parent’s cancer progressed from treatable to terminal due to repeated dismissal of symptoms over 14 months. The health authority maintained that proper assessment procedures were followed. Our Calgary medical malpractice lawyers employed expert testimony under Rule 5.37 of the Alberta Rules of Court to support concerns about failure to order appropriate diagnostic tests. We assisted the client in pursuing a settlement citing the Medical Profession Regulation (Alta Reg 76/2007), which addressed financial security for the client’s dependent children and compensation for shortened life expectancy.

‍

A patient underwent routine gallbladder surgery that resulted in bile duct damage and life-threatening sepsis requiring multiple corrective procedures. The hospital claimed it was a known complication. Our medical malpractice lawyers in Calgary worked with medical evidence to assess whether there was a breach of the standard of care under applicable professional obligations, showing concerns with adherence to accepted practices. We helped the patient pursue compensation through the legal process, covering extended hospitalization, lost wages during the 18-month recovery, and ongoing treatment needs.

A retiree developed a serious facial abscess after complications arose following a root canal procedure, resulting in the spread of infection to surrounding areas. The insurer initially offered a limited amount of compensation for what it characterized as temporary symptoms. Our dental malpractice lawyers reviewed the matter in light of Section 142 of the Alberta Health Care Insurance Act (RSA 2000, c A-20) to assess healthcare costs associated with the treatment. Through the claims process, compensation was obtained from the dentist and clinic owner under applicable professional liability coverage, addressing hospitalization, corrective procedures, and the lasting effects of facial scarring.

A middle-aged professional visited their dentist regularly for five years while an abnormal lesion grew unaddressed, eventually diagnosed as stage III oral cancer requiring extensive surgery and radiation. The dental practice denied negligence, citing patient non-compliance. Our dental malpractice lawyers relied on applicable provisions of Alberta’s evidence law to present expert testimony addressing diagnostic standards and alleged breaches of care. Through the legal process, the client pursued compensation to address medical expenses, reconstructive procedures, and loss of earning capacity, within the applicable limitation period under Alberta’s Limitations Act (RSA 2000, c L-12).

A college student suffered permanent lingual nerve damage during routine wisdom tooth removal, resulting in chronic pain, speech impairment, and taste loss. The dentist’s insurer claimed the injury was a known risk the patient had accepted. Our dental malpractice lawyers reviewed the circumstances of the procedure with reference to Section 7 of Alberta’s Health Professions Act (RSA 2000, c H-7), including whether the applicable standard of care and informed consent requirements were met. Through the claims process, the client pursued compensation for future medical treatment, speech therapy, and diminished quality of life, based on alleged departures from the College of Dental Surgeons of Alberta’s Standards of Practice on informed consent, resulting in a resolution intended to address the long-term impact of the injury.

A pregnant woman was prescribed a contraindicated medication, which was alleged to have contributed to fetal neurological injury, resulting in dyskinetic cerebral palsy. The pharmaceutical company and prescribing physician disputed responsibility. Our cerebral palsy lawyers reviewed the matter and relied on expert evidence consistent with Section 9 of the Alberta Health Care Protection Act (c. A-20.5) to assess potential issues related to duty of care and informed consent. Through the legal process, compensation was pursued to support the establishment of a trust intended to assist with the child’s long-term medical care, adaptive equipment, and quality-of-life needs in accordance with applicable Alberta legislation.

A baby was diagnosed with athetoid cerebral palsy following complications during delivery, where umbilical cord compression was not promptly identified or addressed. The healthcare provider maintained that the condition was genetic rather than preventable. Our cerebral palsy lawyers worked with qualified medical experts, relying on evidence permitted under Section 3(1) of the Alberta Evidence Act (RSA 2000, c A-18), to assess whether the standard of care was met. The claim proceeded within the applicable limitation period for minors under the Limitations Act (RSA 2000, c L-12), allowing the family to pursue compensation intended to support long-term care, therapy, and future needs.

A child was diagnosed with cerebral palsy following complications during labour, including delayed medical intervention. Concerns were raised regarding the monitoring and response to signs of fetal distress. Our cerebral palsy lawyers reviewed the circumstances in light of Alberta’s regulatory framework, including professional obligations under the Health Professions Act (RSA 2000, c H-7), and the governance of hospital care under the Alberta Hospital Act (RSA 2000, c H-12). Through the litigation process, the family pursued compensation to address long-term care needs, medical support, and home accommodations. (Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.)

A mother and infant sustained serious complications after administration of incorrect medication dosages during induced labor. The hospital attempted to limit liability by claiming contributory factors. Our birth injury lawyers cited breaches of Section 9.1 of the Health Information Act (RSA 2000, c H-5) and medication protocols under the Hospitals Act (RSA 2000, c H-12). The claim resulted in a significant financial recovery intended to address maternal injuries, developmental therapies for the infant, and counselling supports for the family, subject to the specific facts of the case.

A difficult delivery resulted in permanent brachial plexus injury when excessive force was applied during forceps extraction. The medical team stated the injury was unavoidable due to shoulder dystocia. Counsel for the family relied on expert medical evidence, permitted under Section 6(1) of the Alberta Evidence Act (RSA 2000, c A-18), to assess whether appropriate technique and alternative delivery options were reasonably considered. The claim included compensation to address medical treatment, surgical interventions, ongoing therapy, and future care needs, and was commenced within the applicable limitation period under the Limitations Act (RSA 2000, c L-12), including provisions that may apply to minors.

A newborn experienced severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy following a delay in delivery despite signs of fetal distress. Our birth injury lawyers reviewed the care provided in light of applicable professional standards and Alberta legislation, including the Health Professions Act. Through the civil claims process, the family pursued compensation to address long-term care needs, assistive supports, and quality-of-life considerations. (Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.)

A young couple lost their lives due to a faulty furnace in their leased apartment. The property management company denied knowledge of maintenance issues. Our wrongful death lawyers cited Section 16(c) of the Residential Tenancies Act (SA 2004, c R-17.1) establishing the landlord’s duty to maintain heating systems in safe working order. We assisted the family in pursuing compensation under the Fatal Accidents Act (RSA 2000, c F-8, s. 8), reflecting the losses recognized by law and supporting them after this preventable tragedy.

‍

A skilled tradesman perished when improperly secured scaffolding collapsed at a commercial construction project. The employer disputed responsibility, citing worker error. Our wrongful death lawyers reviewed Section 2(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act (SA 2017, c O-2.1), identifying concerns regarding safety regulations and inadequate training. Our legal team assisted the family in pursuing compensation through both Workers’ Compensation Board proceedings and a third-party negligence claim against the scaffolding supplier under the Tort-feasors Act (RSA 2000, c T-5).

A beloved father of three died from an anaphylactic reaction after being administered medication he was documented to be allergic to. The hospital claimed standard protocols were followed. Our wrongful death lawyers invoked Section 578 of Alberta’s Insurance Act (RSA 2000, c I-3) along with the Fatal Accidents Act (RSA 2000, c F-8) to assess the circumstances of the medical error. Our involvement supported the family in pursuing compensation, addressing loss of financial support, grief counselling, and bereavement damages during this difficult time.

A patient developed permanent cauda equina syndrome after a surgeon allegedly delayed emergency treatment following signs of spinal compression. The hospital’s insurer is citing alleged pre-existing conditions, worked with qualified medical experts, and relied on the principles in Ter Neuzen v. Korn (Supreme Court of Canada) to assess whether there was a breach of the applicable standard of care. We pursued compensation and remedies under the Health Professions Act (RSA 2000, c H-7), covering loss of bladder/bowel function, sexual dysfunction, chronic pain management, and psychological treatment for the resulting depression and anxiety, in the context of a delayed diagnosis claim.

A passenger sustained an incomplete C5-C6 spinal cord injury when a commercial van rolled over due to defective tires, resulting in partial quadriplegia requiring round-the-clock care. The manufacturer denied liability for the tire failure. Our spinal cord injury lawyers leveraged engineering experts’ evidence and Section 4 of the Tort-feasors Act (RSA 2000, c T-5) to advance claims involving both product liability and driver negligence. We pursued compensation to address lifelong attendant care, specialized medical equipment, rehabilitation services, and home accessibility modifications, structured in accordance with the Alberta Rules of Court to reflect the client’s long-term care needs.

A construction worker fell from inadequately secured scaffolding, suffering a complete T10 spinal cord injury resulting in permanent paraplegia. The insurer alleged contributory negligence in response to the claim. Our spinal cord injury lawyers applied Section 2(1) of Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety Act and Part 23 of the OHS Code, establishing multiple safety violations by the employer. We pursued compensation, covering lifetime medical care, home modifications, specialized mobility equipment, and loss of future earning capacity under the Workers’ Compensation Act (RSA 2000, c W-15), helping the client address the long-term financial consequences of life-altering injuries.

A worker endured severe burns from a chemical leak, requiring extensive surgeries. The company initially disputed responsibility. Our catastrophic injury lawyers reviewed applicable provisions of the Dangerous Goods Transportation and Handling Act (RSA 2000, c D-4), helping the worker pursue appropriate compensation for treatment and suffering. (Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.

A driver sustained a traumatic brain injury in a semi-truck collision, facing permanent memory loss. The trucking firm denied fault. Our catastrophic injury lawyers helped the family understand their legal options under Section 115 of the Traffic Safety Act (RSA 2000, c T-6) and pursued a compensation claim, without guaranteeing or implying that specific amounts would be awarded.

‍

A worker suffered a spinal cord injury after a scaffolding failure, leaving him paraplegic. The insurer blamed him for the fall. Our catastrophic injury lawyers referenced Section 2(1) of Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety Act (RSA 2000, c O-2), supporting concerns about employer compliance. We helped the client pursue compensation for lifelong care, home adjustments, and lost wages under the Workers’ Compensation Act (RSA 2000, c W-15).

A retired teacher suffered second- and third-degree burns to her face, neck, and hands when a pressure cooker unexpectedly released scalding steam due to an alleged defect in the pressure-release valve. The manufacturer initially disputed the extent of liability. Our burn injury lawyers pursued a product liability claim relying on Alberta consumer protection legislation and principles recognized in Ter Neuzen v. Korn. Through the claims process, compensation was pursued for specialized burn treatment, ongoing pain management, permanent scarring, and reduced quality of life.

A family of four suffered serious burn injuries while escaping their apartment after a fire caused by faulty electrical wiring that ignited surrounding insulation. The property management company disputed responsibility, raising concerns about potential tenant conduct. Our burn injury lawyers conducted a detailed investigation, including consultation with qualified electrical engineering experts, who identified issues related to applicable provisions of the Canadian Electrical Code and Alberta’s Safety Codes Act. Through the claims process, the family pursued compensation to address hospitalization, reconstructive surgeries, respiratory injuries from smoke exposure, and other long-term impacts arising from the incident.

An industrial worker suffered third-degree chemical burns across the torso and arms after a defective valve released corrosive material. The employer’s insurer initially disputed the extent of liability, citing existing safety protocols. Our burn injury lawyers reviewed workplace safety obligations under Section 13 of Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety Act, focusing on equipment maintenance and the use of appropriate protective gear. Through the claims process, the worker pursued compensation for medical treatment, reconstructive surgery, permanent disfigurement, and psychological impact, including consideration of benefits available under the Workers’ Compensation Act (RSA 2000, c W-15). (Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes. Each case depends on its specific facts and applicable law.)

A senior citizen suffered an undiagnosed mild traumatic brain injury after slipping on unmarked wet flooring at a shopping mall, leading to balance issues, cognitive decline, and loss of independence. The property management company disputed responsibility for the incident. Our brain injury lawyers reviewed the circumstances of the incident and relied on Section 5 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act (RSA 2000, c O-4) to assess whether the defendant met its obligation to maintain reasonably safe premises. Through the claims process, the client pursued compensation relating to neurological care, in-home support services, and loss of quality of life. Our legal team worked with neurologists, occupational therapists, and life care planners to document the functional and cognitive impacts of the brain injury.

A teacher sustained a moderate traumatic brain injury in a rear-end collision, leading to chronic headaches, concentration difficulties, and personality changes that significantly affected her ability to continue working in her profession. The at-fault driver’s insurer questioned the cause of her reported symptoms. Our brain injury lawyers relied on neuropsychological assessments and relevant provisions of Alberta’s Insurance Act (RSA 2000, c I-3) to support the connection between the collision and her reported symptoms. We assisted the client in pursuing a settlement that addressed future income loss, specialized cognitive therapy, and impacts on her quality of life, with the claim commenced within the applicable limitation period.

The employer’s insurer initially took the position that limited compensation was appropriate, citing partial compliance with safety regulations. Our brain injury lawyers reviewed the circumstances of the incident with reference to Section 2(1) of Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety Act (SA 2017, c O-2.1), which outlines an employer’s obligation to maintain a safe work environment. Through the claims process, the client was able to pursue compensation intended to address long-term cognitive rehabilitation, reduced earning capacity, and necessary home modifications under applicable legislation, including the Workers’ Compensation Act (RSA 2000, c W-15).

A drone injured a bystander. Our aviation crash lawyers supported the individual in seeking compensation for medical needs through a resolved claim.

A mechanical failure caused a crash, injuring two. Our airplane accident lawyers helped pursue a claim involving manufacturer liability, which resulted in a negotiated settlement.

A passenger suffered neck injuries due to turbulence. The airline denied fault, but our aviation accident lawyer assisted in advancing a claim under the Carriage by Air Act, which was later resolved through compensation.

Multiple victims were exposed to toxic chemicals when a tanker truck overturned, causing respiratory damage and evacuation of nearby properties. The transportation company initially disputed the scope of responsibility and compensation. Our truck accident lawyers relied on applicable federal and provincial legislation, including the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act (S.C. 1992, c. 34) and Section 13 of Alberta’s Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (RSA 2000, c E-12), to assess potential liability related to the handling of hazardous materials. Through the legal process, compensation was pursued to address medical monitoring, property

A teacher suffered permanent disability when an overloaded logging truck lost control on a mountain curve, spilling its cargo across the highway. The insurer raised an argument of partial responsibility related to the vehicle following distance. Our truck accident lawyers relied on Section 7(1) of the Commercial Vehicle Dimension and Weight Regulation (Alta Reg 315/2002) to address issues related to the carrier’s non-compliance with weight restrictions. Through the claims process, compensation was pursued for lifelong medical treatment, vocational retraining, and pain and suffering in accordance with applicable Alberta legislation, including the Insurance Act (RSA 2000, c I-3). (Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.

A family vehicle was seriously damaged when a semi-truck jackknifed during icy conditions, causing catastrophic injuries to all occupants. The trucking company took the position that road conditions contributed to the incident. Our truck accident lawyers reviewed the circumstances of the collision and identified potential compliance issues under the Commercial Vehicle Safety Regulation (Alta Reg 121/2009), including concerns related to brake maintenance and driver hours of service. Through the claims process, compensation was pursued to address rehabilitation costs, home care needs, and future income loss, with liability issues considered under Alberta law, including vicarious liability principles.

A nightshift worker was severely injured by a driver who fled the scene, leaving the victim with spinal damage and no apparent recourse. Our pedestrian accident lawyers assisted the client in pursuing a claim through the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act (RSA 2000, c M-22), invoking Section 18 covering unidentified motorists. Through this process, the client was able to obtain compensation from the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund based on medical documentation and expert assessments, helping address treatment needs and income loss related to the injury.

A shopper was injured when a vehicle backed out of a parking space, resulting in a hip fracture requiring surgery and ongoing mobility support.

‍

A teacher was struck while using a marked crosswalk, suffering multiple fractures and a traumatic brain injury requiring extensive rehabilitation. The driver’s insurance initially made a settlement offer, claiming poor visibility. Our pedestrian accident lawyers reviewed the circumstances with reference to Section 41(1) of Alberta’s Use of Highway and Rules of the Road Regulation (Alta Reg 304/2002), which outlines drivers’ duties at crosswalks. We assisted the client in pursuing compensation under the Insurance Act (RSA 2000, c I-3) that addressed rehabilitation needs, income loss, and other applicable damages.

A motorcyclist suffered spinal injuries after encountering debris that had fallen from an unsecured commercial truck load. The trucking company initially disputed responsibility. Our motorcycle accident lawyers assisted the client in understanding potential obligations under Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act and relevant commercial vehicle regulations, and the client was able to pursue compensation that addressed medical treatment, long-term care needs, and the ongoing impact of the injury. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.

A rider was critically injured when a parked car suddenly opened its door into their path, causing a traumatic brain injury and months of recovery. The insurer argued shared negligence. Our motorcycle accident lawyers reviewed the circumstances in relation to Section 402(1) of the Alberta Highway Traffic Regulation, which addresses a vehicle operator’s responsibilities when opening doors. We assisted the rider in pursuing compensation for rehabilitation needs, income loss, and home adjustments within the limitation period set by the Limitations Act (RSA 2000, c L-12). Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.

A motorcyclist was struck by a car making a left turn, resulting in multiple fractures and nerve damage in their right arm. The insurer initially suggested a lower settlement amount, noting concerns about speed at the time of the collision. Our motorcycle accident lawyers reviewed the circumstances under Alberta’s traffic legislation to help clarify right-of-way responsibilities. Through the claims process, the client was able to pursue compensation that reflected their medical treatment needs, rehabilitation, and reduced earning capacity

A cyclist injured in a hit-and-run collision required long-term medical care following significant head trauma. Our lawyers assisted by reviewing available evidence, exploring options under Alberta’s traffic legislation, and guiding the client through the claims process. Additional information later became available that helped clarify the circumstances surrounding the incident, and the client was ultimately able to pursue compensation reflecting their injuries and related losses.

A shopper returning to their parked vehicle discovered significant damage and injuries from being sideswiped while loading groceries. The perpetrator fled without exchanging information. The insurance company initially denied the claim due to limited evidence. Our hit and run lawyers assisted the client by reviewing obligations under Section 187(1) of the Traffic Safety Act and exploring possible unidentified motorist coverage available through their policy. We helped the client pursue compensation after additional evidence, including surveillance footage, became available, which supported

A jogger was struck from behind by a vehicle that immediately fled the scene, leaving them with severe spinal injuries and unable to identify the driver. Our hit and run lawyers assisted the client in exploring their options under Section 69(1) of Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act and Section 17 of the Insurance Act (RSA 2000, c I-3), including potential access to the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund. Through the claims process, the client was able to pursue compensation that supported their rehabilitation needs and income loss following the incident.

A family lost their primary provider when a commercial driver operating under the influence of alcohol crossed the median, causing a serious head-on collision. The employer’s insurance raised arguments seeking to limit corporate liability based on the circumstances of the claim. Our lawyers experienced in impaired-driving accident matters relied on relevant provisions of Section 187 of the Traffic Safety Act concerning employer responsibility, Criminal Code Section 320.14(3) addressing impaired driving causing death, and the Fatal Accidents Act (RSA 2000, c F-8). Through the litigation process, compensation was awarded, addressing lifetime lost income, dependent support, and other damages recognized under Alberta law, with findings relating to both the driver’s conduct and the employer’s practices.

A retired teacher was struck in a marked crosswalk by a driver alleged to have had blood alcohol content well above the legal limit, resulting in multiple fractures requiring extensive orthopedic surgery. The insurance company disputed full liability, suggesting pedestrian inattention. Our DUI accident lawyers reviewed available breathalyzer evidence and considered applicable provisions of Section 115(2)(i) of the Traffic Safety Act regarding pedestrian right-of-way, alongside relevant provisions of the Criminal Code related to impaired driving causing bodily harm. Through the claims process, the matter was resolved with compensation intended to address home accessibility modifications, ongoing physiotherapy, and loss of enjoyment of life, subject to the specific facts of the case.

A nursing student sustained serious spinal injuries and a traumatic brain injury after a collision involving an allegedly impaired driver traveling at a high rate of speed. The driver’s insurer initially disputed the claim, citing pre-existing conditions. Our DUI accident lawyers relied on applicable provisions of Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act and the Criminal Code related to impaired driving to help establish liability based on the available evidence. Through the claims process, the client was able to pursue compensation for medical treatment, future care needs, and income loss, based on the specific facts of the case.

A family sought assistance after losing a loved one in a severe intersection collision involving a red-light violation. Our motor vehicle accident lawyers helped them understand their options under Alberta’s Insurance Act, including potential dependency-related benefits. Through the claims process, the family was able to pursue compensation intended to support their financial needs following the loss. (Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.

A retiree was injured after being struck by a distracted driver while crossing the street, resulting in a fractured pelvis and significant rehabilitation needs. The insurer initially disputed liability, arguing the pedestrian was jaywalking. Our lawyers reviewed the circumstances under Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act and helped the client pursue compensation for medical treatment, future care needs, and general damages. The claim was resolved within the timelines required under Alberta’s Limitations Act.

A young professional was injured in a rear-end collision and experienced chronic neck pain and income disruption. The insurer initially assessed the claim as a minor injury. After reviewing the evidence, including the driver’s obligation to maintain a safe following distance under Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act, our team assisted the client in pursuing compensation for medical treatment, wage loss, and general damages. The matter ultimately resolved for an amount that reflected the ongoing impact of the injuries.

A family vacation turned tragic when their tour bus lost control on a steep mountain road, resulting in a rollover accident that caused catastrophic injuries to multiple passengers. The tour company attributed the incident to unforeseeable mechanical issues. Our team reviewed the matter by examining maintenance records and operational practices, including considerations under Section 23 of the Alberta Evidence Act (RSA 2000, c A-18), as well as applicable requirements under the Commercial Vehicle Drivers’ Hours of Service Regulations (SOR/2005-313). Through the legal process, the injured passengers were able to pursue claims related to long-term medical needs, accessibility accommodations, and non-pecuniary damages, based on the circumstances of the incident and applicable law.

A teacher chaperoning a field trip suffered multiple fractures when a commercial truck ran a stop sign and collided with their school bus. The trucking company’s insurer attempted to deflect liability to the bus operator. Our legal team reviewed applicable provisions, including Section 54(1) of the Use of Highway and Rules of the Road Regulation concerning right-of-way obligations, as well as Section 130 of Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act related to commercial vehicle operations, to assess liability issues. Through the claims process, the teacher was able to pursue compensation for medical treatment, lost teaching income, and non-pecuniary damages arising from the collision, allowing the matter to be resolved based on the circumstances and applicable law.

A university student was thrown forward when a city bus driver suddenly applied the brakes, causing the student to suffer a severe concussion and spinal injuries. The transit authority disputed liability, arguing that the stop was necessary due to traffic conditions. Our legal team assisted the client by reviewing applicable provisions, including Section 75 of Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act regarding common carrier duty of care and the Occupiers’ Liability Act (RSA 2000, c O-4), to assess the circumstances of the incident. Through the claims process, the client pursued compensation for ongoing neurological treatment, academic accommodations, and impacts on quality of life, holding the municipal transit authority accountable under applicable Alberta law.

A family lost their breadwinner when a commercial tour boat capsized during adverse weather conditions, resulting in drowning despite the use of a life jacket. The tour operator’s insurer initially disputed the extent of liability, asserting that the deceased had assumed certain risks. Our boat accident lawyers reviewed and relied on Section 140 of the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 and the Small Vessel Regulations (SOR/2010-91) to assess whether the operator met applicable safety and operational obligations, including weather-related decision-making and onboard safety measures. Through the claims process, the family pursued compensation under Alberta’s Fatal Accidents Act (RSA 2000, c F-8) to address lost financial support, funeral expenses, and counselling needs.

A recreational angler suffered second- and third-degree burns after a flash fire occurred during refuelling at a marina, when a neighbouring vessel’s fuel line ruptured. The marina’s insurer disputed liability, citing concerns about vessel maintenance. Our boat accident lawyers relied on expert evidence and relevant provisions of the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, including Section 106 relating to safe vessel operation, as well as Section 17 of the Marine Liability Act, to assess potential shared responsibility between the marina and the vessel owner. Through the claims process, compensation was pursued to address medical treatment, rehabilitation needs, permanent scarring, and loss of enjoyment of life.

A family on a recreational outing was involved in a collision with a powerboat travelling at excessive speed, resulting in serious injuries to the mother and psychological distress to her children. The powerboat operator’s insurer initially disputed the extent of liability, suggesting contributory factors related to vessel positioning. Our boat accident lawyers reviewed the incident under the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, and the Collision Regulations (C.R.C., c. 1416), including requirements related to lookout and safe navigation. Through the claims process, the family was able to pursue compensation addressing medical care, psychological treatment, and property damage associated with the incident.

‍

A competitive cyclist sustained serious spinal injuries and a traumatic brain injury after being struck from behind by a motorist who left the scene.

Because the driver was initially unidentified, the client faced uncertainty regarding insurance coverage and possible recovery options. Our lawyers assisted with exploring available avenues of compensation involving an unidentified motorist.

After witness information helped identify the driver, the claim was advanced to pursue compensation for rehabilitation, adaptive equipment, future care requirements, and other accident-related losses.

Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.

‍

A recreational cyclist sustained a complex tibial plateau fracture after being struck by a vehicle making a right turn through an intersection.

The injury required surgery and permanent hardware implantation. The insurer raised comparative-negligence arguments during the claim.

Our lawyers reviewed the driver’s obligation to yield and pursued compensation for ongoing mobility limitations, future treatment requirements, income loss, and the long-term impact of the injury.

‍

A commuter cyclist sustained a broken collarbone, concussion, and significant soft-tissue injuries after a motorist opened a parked vehicle door into an active bike lane.

The insurer initially alleged that the cyclist shared responsibility for the incident. Our bicycle accident lawyers reviewed the motorist’s obligation to ensure it was safe before opening a vehicle door into traffic.

Through the claims process, the client pursued compensation for medical treatment, rehabilitation, bicycle-related expenses, and income lost while unable to work.

‍

An experienced rider sustained life-altering injuries after an ATV steering component failed during ordinary operation.

The manufacturer alleged that the accident resulted from user error and improper maintenance. Our lawyers reviewed possible product liability, warranty, maintenance, and product-safety issues involving the manufacturer and distributor.

The claim pursued compensation for medical treatment, ongoing care, disability-related expenses, and lost income.

Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.

‍

A teenage passenger sustained a traumatic brain injury and permanent cognitive impairment after being thrown from an ATV when the operator lost control on private property.

The insurer initially disputed coverage based on exclusions involving recreational vehicles. Our lawyers reviewed the operator’s responsibilities, possible occupiers’ liability issues, and the available sources of insurance coverage.

Compensation was pursued for long-term treatment, future care requirements, and reduced earning capacity within the applicable limitation period.

‍

A recreational rider sustained multiple fractures and spinal injuries after an ATV rollover involving unmarked terrain hazards on a designated trail.

The landowner’s insurer disputed liability and argued that the rider had accepted the risks associated with off-road riding. Our lawyers reviewed the occupier’s responsibility to take reasonable care in maintaining reasonably safe premises for permitted users.

The claim pursued compensation for medical treatment, rehabilitation, future care requirements, and reduced earning capacity, based on the circumstances of the accident.

‍